Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This allows one to run 'git rebase --exec "make check" --signoff'
> which is useful when preparing a patch series for publication and is
> more convenient than doing the signoff with another --exec command.
> This change also allows --root without --onto to work with --signoff
> as well (--root with --onto was already supported). Note that the
> failing test is due to a bug in 'rebase --root' when the root commit
> is empty which will be fixed in the next commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
How important is the word "implicit" in the title? Is it your
intention to actively ignore --signoff when we fall into the
rebase--interactive codepath explicitly?
I offhand do not think of a strong reason why it is a bad idea to
run "git rebase -i --signoff", turn a few "pick" to either "reword"
or "edit", and then expect that the editor to edit log messages for
these commits to add your sign-off when you start editing them.
The "pick"s that are left as-is would also turn into doing an
otherwise no-op "commit --amend -s", I guess.
If you are teaching --signoff to the whole of "rebase--interactive",
then "git rebase --help" needs a bit of update.
--signoff::
This flag is passed to 'git am' to sign off all the rebased
commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]). Incompatible with the
--interactive option.
