Hi Buga, I just have two thoughts to contribute as answer, so please excuse the heavily cut quoted text: On Sun, 11 Mar 2018, Igor Djordjevic wrote: > Sometimes one just needs to read the manual, and I don`t really think > this is a ton complicated, but just something we didn`t really have > before (real merge rebasing), so it requires a moment to grasp the > concept. If that were the case, we would not keep getting bug reports about --preserve-merges failing to reorder patches. > Saying in favor of `--rebase-merges`, you mean as a separate option, > alongside `--recreate-merges` (once that series lands)? No. I am against yet another option. The only reason I pollute the option name space further with --recreate-merges is that it would be confusing to users if the new mode was called --preserve-merges=v2 (but work *totally differently*). Ciao, Dscho
