Re: [PATCH 13/44] pack: move approximate object count to object store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The approximate_object_count() function maintains a rough count of
>> objects in a repository to estimate how long object name abbreviates
>> should be.  Object names are scoped to a repository and the
>> appropriate length may differ by repository, so the object count
>> should not be global.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/packfile.c b/packfile.c
>> @@ -813,8 +811,8 @@ static int approximate_object_count_valid;
>>  unsigned long approximate_object_count(void)
>>  {
>> -       static unsigned long count;
>> -       if (!approximate_object_count_valid) {
>> +       if (!the_repository->objects.approximate_object_count_valid) {
>> +               unsigned long count;
>>                 struct packed_git *p;
>>
>>                 prepare_packed_git();
>> @@ -824,8 +822,9 @@ unsigned long approximate_object_count(void)
>>                                 continue;
>>                         count += p->num_objects;
>>                 }
>> +               the_repository->objects.approximate_object_count = count;
>>         }
>> -       return count;
>> +       return the_repository->objects.approximate_object_count;
>>  }
>> @@ -900,7 +899,7 @@ void prepare_packed_git(void)
>>  void reprepare_packed_git(void)
>>  {
>> -       approximate_object_count_valid = 0;
>> +       the_repository->objects.approximate_object_count_valid = 0;
>
> Not an issue specific to this patch, but where, how, when does
> 'approximate_object_count_valid' ever get set to anything other than
> 0? Even in the existing code (without this patch), there doesn't seem
> to be anyplace which sets this to a non-zero value. Am I missing
> something obvious (or subtle)?

Probably related to this
https://public-inbox.org/git/20180226085508.GA30343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t

-- 
Duy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux