Re: [PATCH 00/11] Moving global state into the repository object (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> Looking at the full-series diff though, it makes me wonder if we
>>>> should keep prepare_packed_git() private (i.e. how we initialize the
>>>> object store, packfile included, is a private matter). How about
>>>> something like this on top?
>>>
>>> Yup, that looks cleaner.
>>
>> I agree that it looks cleaner. So we plan on just putting
>> it on top of that series?
>
> We tend to avoid "oops, that was wrong and here is a band aid on
> top" for things that are still mushy, so it would be preferrable to
> get it fixed inline, especially if there are more changes to the
> other parts of the series coming.

I agree with this. Stefan, if you're getting bored with rerolling
refactor patches, I can update this series and send out v2.
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux