Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Let's see how others find it useful and/or if the changed code gets >> in the way of others (I am not absolutely sure if the changes are >> free of regression to existing users who do not use the new >> feature). > > I think if you're on the fence about merging it down (and others don't > chime in saying the want it / like it) it makes sense to merge down > 1-14/17 and we could discard 15-17/17 for now for a later re-submission > and discussion once the earlier part of the series lands in master. Or we merge everything and let people discover glitches and complain. Reverting the last pieces can wait until then ;-).
