Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2018, #03; Wed, 21)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * en/rename-directory-detection (2018-02-14) 29 commits
>  - merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed file
>  - merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames
>  - directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs
>  - merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases
>  - merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames
>  - merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames
>  - merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames
>  - merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees
>  - merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name
>  - merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging
>  - merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts
>  - merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()
>  - merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames
>  - merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs
>  - merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious
>  - merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs
>  - merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic
>  - merge-recursive: move the get_renames() function
>  - directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty files
>  - directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked files
>  - directory rename detection: miscellaneous testcases to complete coverage
>  - directory rename detection: testcases exploring possibly suboptimal merges
>  - directory rename detection: more involved edge/corner testcases
>  - directory rename detection: testcases checking which side did the rename
>  - directory rename detection: files/directories in the way of some renames
>  - directory rename detection: partially renamed directory testcase/discussion
>  - directory rename detection: testcases to avoid taking detection too far
>  - directory rename detection: directory splitting testcases
>  - directory rename detection: basic testcases
>
>  Rename detection logic in "diff" family that is used in "merge" has
>  learned to guess when all of x/a, x/b and x/c have moved to z/a,
>  z/b and z/c, it is likely that x/d added in the meantime would also
>  want to move to z/d by taking the hint that the entire directory
>  'x' moved to 'z'.  A bug causing dirty files involved in a rename
>  to be overwritten during merge has also been fixed as part of this
>  work.
>
>  Will merge to 'next'.

SZEDER Gábor requested (just over a week ago, but I was out at a
funeral) that I switch is_null_sha1() to is_null_oid() in one of these
patches.  It's a trivial change and squashes cleanly, but if you're
merging this series to next, I'm curious whether I should submit this
change as a new patch on top of the series, if you'd prefer a full
re-roll of the whole series, or something else.  It's the only change
I'm aware of anyone wanting to see; otherwise I think the series is
complete.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux