Re: [PATCH] git-rebase: suggest to use git-add instead of git-update-index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx> writes:

> The command is part of the main porcelain making git-add more
> appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  git-rebase.sh |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>  I don't know if this is good or not, maybe it is a matter of taste, but
>  as a new git user I prefer to use git add.

I like it.  Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux