[PATCH] git-rebase: suggest to use git-add instead of git-update-index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The command is part of the main porcelain making git-add more
appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx>
---
 git-rebase.sh |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

 I don't know if this is good or not, maybe it is a matter of taste, but
 as a new git user I prefer to use git add.

diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
index 61770b5..2aa3a01 100755
--- a/git-rebase.sh
+++ b/git-rebase.sh
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ continue_merge () {
 	if test -n "$unmerged"
 	then
 		echo "You still have unmerged paths in your index"
-		echo "did you forget update-index?"
+		echo "did you forget to use git add?"
 		die "$RESOLVEMSG"
 	fi
 
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ do
 	--continue)
 		git-diff-files --quiet || {
 			echo "You must edit all merge conflicts and then"
-			echo "mark them as resolved using git update-index"
+			echo "mark them as resolved using git add"
 			exit 1
 		}
 		if test -d "$dotest"
-- 
1.5.2.816.gc5560-dirty

-- 
Jonas Fonseca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux