Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> (although the calloc() case is slightly different from mallocz()), >> see: https://public-inbox.org/git/871shum182.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Hmm. I do think xmallocz is a bit more explicit instruction of "please > NUL-terminate this for me" than xcalloc is. So I don't think it's > inconsistent to say this one is OK, but the trailing-NULL one that you > linked is not. Yeah, I too thought "slightly different" was an understatement of the week ;-).
