Re: [PATCH 0/2] minor GETTEXT_POISON fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:06:53AM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote:

> 
> > On 06 Feb 2018, at 09:42, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > I set NO_GETTEXT=1 in my config.mak, and happened to notice that running
> > the tests with GETTEXT_POISON fails. I think this has been broken for
> > years, but I don't generally play with GETTEXT_POISON. ;)
> 
> On Travis we run GETTEXT_POISON with gettext installed.
> What do you think about an additional job with GETTEXT_POISON and NO_GETTEXT=1?

I think it's probably a waste of CPU. ;)

It would be running the whole test suite to fix this one particular bug,
which I don't think is pretty likely to regress (at least not more than
any other bug). Whereas running with GETTEXT_POISON is meant to shake
out strings that maybe shouldn't be translated, which is a very likely
bug to get introduced.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux