Re: [PATCH 00/15] git-note: A mechanisim for providing free-form after-the-fact annotations on commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Which is why we:
> 
>   a) allow these things to migrate into packed-refs, because
>   getting into there is a hellva lot cheaper than getting into
>   a packfile;
> 
>   b) move them into a packfile when we repack loose objects,
>   because then we have really good access.
> 
>   c) take them out of packed-refs once they are into a packfile,
>   and get them out of the loose refs/notes directory as early as
>   possible.

Three-tier layout? Loose note refs -> packed refs -> packfile? 

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux