Re: [PATCH 00/15] git-note: A mechanisim for providing free-form after-the-fact annotations on commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 28 May 2007, Johan Herland wrote:
> 
> I still don't see what makes note objects inherently more expensive than
> commit objects. Except for the refs, of course, but we're getting rid
> of those (at least replacing them with a more efficient reverse mapping).

It's exactly the refs that I worry about.

Anything that needs to read in all notes at startup is going to be _slow_.

In contrast, commits we read when (and only when) we need them.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux