Re: [PATCH 10/8] [DO NOT APPLY, but improve?] rebase--interactive: introduce "stop" command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Jacob Keller" <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jake suggested using "x false" instead of "edit" for some corner cases.
>>>
>>> I do prefer using "x false" for all kinds of things such as stopping
>>> before a commit (edit only let's you stop after a commit), and the
>>> knowledge that "x false" does the least amount of actions behind my back.
>>>
>>> We should have that command as well, maybe?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I agree. I use "x false" very often, and I think stop is probably a
>> better solution since it avoids spawning an extra shell that will just
>> fail. Not sure if stop implies too much about "stop the whole thing"
>> as opposed to "stop here and let me do something manual", but I think
>> it's clear enough.
>>
> 'hold' or 'pause' maybe options (leads to
> http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/put+on+hold offering procastinate etc.)
> 'adjourn'.
>
>

I like break, as suggested by Dscho. That also works well for
abbreviation if we drop the "bud" command.

Thanks,
Jake



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux