Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Jake suggested using "x false" instead of "edit" for some corner cases.
>
> I do prefer using "x false" for all kinds of things such as stopping
> before a commit (edit only let's you stop after a commit), and the
> knowledge that "x false" does the least amount of actions behind my back.
>
> We should have that command as well, maybe?
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 1 +
> sequencer.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index 3cd7446d0b..9eac53f0c5 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ l, label <label>= label current HEAD with a name
> t, reset <label> = reset HEAD to a label
> b, bud = reset HEAD to the revision labeled 'onto', no arguments
> m, merge [<label-or-commit>]* = create a merge commit using a given commit's message
> +y, stay = stop for shortcut for
>
> These lines can be re-ordered; they are executed from top to bottom.
> " | git stripspace --comment-lines >>"$todo"
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 2b4e6b1232..4b3b9fe59d 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ enum todo_command {
> TODO_RESET,
> TODO_BUD,
> TODO_MERGE,
> + TODO_STOP,
I see that your original idea was "stop", but then you probably realized
that there would be no good abbreviation for that, and changed your mind.
Personally, I would have called it `break`...
> @@ -2407,6 +2415,8 @@ static int pick_commits(struct todo_list *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
> /* `current` will be incremented below */
> todo_list->current = -1;
> }
> + } else if (item->command == TODO_STOP) {
> + todo_list->current = -1;
That is incorrect, it will most likely write an unexpected `done` file.
Did you mean `return 0` instead?
Ciao,
Dscho
