On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:05:01PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > As for "git config --global", I think the best thing would be to split > > it into two options: something like "git config --user" and "git > > config --xdg-user". That way, it is unambiguous which configuration > > file the user intends to inspect or modify. When a user calls "git > > config --global" and both files exist, it could warn that the command > > is ambiguous. > > > > Thoughts? > > I actually thought that the plan was "you either have this, or the > other one, never both at the same time" (and I think those who > pushed the XDG thing in to the system made us favor it over the > traditional one). So as long as --global updates the one that > exists, and updates XDG one when both or neither do, I think we > should be OK. And from that viewpoint, we definitely do not want > two kinds of --global to pretend as if we support use of both at the > same time. Sorry for coming late to the discussion, but I actually use both. ~/.gitconfig is checked into my Git repo for my home directory and contains settings I preserve across all systems, and the XDG dir is not checked in and contains per-system settings (currently just commit.gpgsign). On my main systems I have a key and sign commits; if it's just some server I log into, I don't. Now, I don't use git config to set options, so I'm happy as long as git config can read both, which it does. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
