Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think the documentation > > ~/.gitconfig > User-specific configuration file. Also called "global" > configuration file. > > should be clarified --- e.g. it could say > > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config > ~/.gitconfig > User-specific configuration files. Because options in > these files are not specific to any repository, thes > are sometimes called global configuration files. Yeah, I think that makes sense. > As for "git config --global", I think the best thing would be to split > it into two options: something like "git config --user" and "git > config --xdg-user". That way, it is unambiguous which configuration > file the user intends to inspect or modify. When a user calls "git > config --global" and both files exist, it could warn that the command > is ambiguous. > > Thoughts? I actually thought that the plan was "you either have this, or the other one, never both at the same time" (and I think those who pushed the XDG thing in to the system made us favor it over the traditional one). So as long as --global updates the one that exists, and updates XDG one when both or neither do, I think we should be OK. And from that viewpoint, we definitely do not want two kinds of --global to pretend as if we support use of both at the same time.
