Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> My point in cc907506 ("send-email: don't use Mail::Address, even if
> available", 2017-08-23) was not that Mail::Address was bad, but that
> changing our behavior depending on whether it was there or not was
> really bad. For example, the issue dealt with in this thread probably
> always existed, but it was present only for *some* users.
Yes, I understand and agree with you that having a single
implementation would make things simpler for both users and bug
wranglers than two sperate implementaions with two different sets of
glitches.
I am just wondering if we picked the right one back then, given this
thread; that's all.
