Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Add missing "-n" (dry-run) option to reflog man page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>   i appreciate the need for brevity, but this just takes us back to,
> is there a standard for man pages, given how they bounce around all
> over the place?
>
>   i tossed in that missing "-n" option for "man git-reflog" since it
> was the *only* option missing from the SYNOPSIS,...

Don't we also take "-v" for "--verbose"?

I am not sure what you meant by "bounce around", but by adding "-n"
without adding "-v", doesn't this patch worsen the situation by
making the result even locally inconsistent?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux