Charles Bailey <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > But that we should take it anyway regardless of that since it'll *also*
>> > work on Linux with your patch, and this logic makes some sense whereas
>> > the other one clearly didn't and just worked by pure accident of some
>> > toolchain semantics that I haven't figured out yet.
>>
>> That is curious and would be nice to know the answer to.
>
> The error that I was getting ...
> My guess is that we are just exposing a pre-existing bug in our Solaris
> build of libpcre.
Sorry, my question was not clear. I think you already mentioned the
above in the thread. What I was curious about was why Ævar was
seeing that JIT disabled with NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT alone on his Linux
setup, i.e. namely this part from his message:
*But* for some reason you still get away with that on Linux. I
don't know why, but I assume the compiler toolchain is more lax
for some reason than on Solaris.n
In any case, thanks for a fix; queued.
