Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Nov 12 2017, Charles Bailey jotted: > >> From: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> If you have a pcre1 library which is compiled with JIT enabled then >> PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE will be defined whether or not the >> NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT configuration is set. >> >> This means that we enable JIT functionality when calling pcre_study >> even if NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT has been explicitly set and we just use plain >> pcre_exec later. >> >> Fix this by using own macro (GIT_PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE) which we set to >> PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE only if NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT is not set and define to >> 0 otherwise, as before. >> --- >> >> I was bisecting an issue with the PCRE support that was causing a test >> ... > > [CC-ing Junio] > > Thanks a lot. This patch looks good to me. Thanks. This patch needs a sign-off, by the way. > But that we should take it anyway regardless of that since it'll *also* > work on Linux with your patch, and this logic makes some sense whereas > the other one clearly didn't and just worked by pure accident of some > toolchain semantics that I haven't figured out yet. That is curious and would be nice to know the answer to.
