Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:
> Here is a somwhat shorter description:
>
> Apply the "clean" process freshly to all tracked files.
> This is useful after changing `core.autocrlf` or the `text`
> attributes in the `.gitattributes` file because
> Git may not consider these files as changed.
I think it is OK to omit .git/config for brevity (I am assuming that
your justification is because you thought it was obvious it is a
configuration variable); but then it is equally obvious (if not
more) that `text` attribute comes from .gitattributes (notice we do
not mention core.autocrlf is a configuration variable in the above,
but we do say `text` is an attribute) so it can also be omitted for
brevity.
> Correct the files that had been commited with CRLF,
> they will from now on have LF instead.
Reading this as a single sentence immediately after the above
paragraph leaves me feel confused. First of all, this would not
happen unless the user corrects core.autocrlf/text like described
above. In fact, updating these settings is done as in order to do
that correction. So I'd say it should not be split.
> Re-run what the `clean` filter does.
This again looks out of place just like the previous sentence. In
fact, provided if "the clean process" is understood by the end user,
this is redundant.
> This option implies `-u`.
Taking these altogether, perhaps
Apply the "clean" process freshly to all tracked files to
forcibly add them again to the index. This is useful after
changing `core.autocrlf` configuration or the `text` attribute
in order to correct files added with wrong CRLF/LF line endings.
This option implies `-u`.
Thanks.
