[snip] > > > @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ for "git add --no-all <pathspec>...", i.e. ignored removed files. > > warning (e.g., if you are manually performing operations on > > submodules). > > > > +--renormalize:: > > + Normalizes the line endings from CRLF to LF of tracked files. > > + This applies to files which are either "text" or "text=auto" > > + in .gitattributes (or core.autocrlf is true or input) > > + --renormalize implies -u > > + > > OK. I think the fact, that clean filters are re-run, and re-evaluated in case they are changed, should be made more clear here. I don't know how to explain it better that CRLF conversion and/or filters are re-applied, this is an attempt: --renormalize:: Normalizes the line endings from CRLF to LF of tracked files, if the .gitattributes or core.autocrlf say so. Additionally the clean and ident filters, if any, are re-run. --renormalize implies -u > > > +static int renormalize_tracked_files(const struct pathspec *pathspec, int flags) > > +{ > > + int i, retval = 0; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { > > + struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i]; > > + > > + if (ce_stage(ce)) > > + continue; /* do not touch unmerged paths */ > > + if (!S_ISREG(ce->ce_mode) && !S_ISLNK(ce->ce_mode)) > > + continue; /* do not touch non blobs */ > > + if (pathspec && !ce_path_match(ce, pathspec, NULL)) > > + continue; > > + retval |= add_file_to_cache(ce->name, flags | HASH_RENORMALIZE); > > We are removing the entry and then adding the same entry under the > same name, and iteration over the active_cache[] from 0 through > active_nr should be safe, I guess. > > > ... > > - add_new_files = !take_worktree_changes && !refresh_only; > > + add_new_files = !take_worktree_changes && !refresh_only && !add_renormalize; > > If renormalize is given, we will *not* take new files, good. > > > @@ -500,7 +521,10 @@ int cmd_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > > > plug_bulk_checkin(); > > > > - exit_status |= add_files_to_cache(prefix, &pathspec, flags); > > + if (add_renormalize) > > + exit_status |= renormalize_tracked_files(&pathspec, flags); > > + else > > + exit_status |= add_files_to_cache(prefix, &pathspec, flags); > > > > if (add_new_files) > > exit_status |= add_files(&dir, flags); > > OK. > > > ... > > int add_option = (ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD|ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_REPLACE| > > (intent_only ? ADD_CACHE_NEW_ONLY : 0)); > > + int newflags = HASH_WRITE_OBJECT; > > + > > + if (flags & HASH_RENORMALIZE) > > + newflags |= HASH_RENORMALIZE; > > ... > > @@ -678,19 +682,23 @@ int add_to_index(struct index_state *istate, const char *path, struct stat *st, > > if (ignore_case) { > > adjust_dirname_case(istate, ce->name); > > } > > + if (!(flags & HASH_RENORMALIZE)) { > > + alias = index_file_exists(istate, ce->name, > > + ce_namelen(ce), ignore_case); > > + if (alias && > > + !ce_stage(alias) && > > + !ie_match_stat(istate, alias, st, ce_option)) { > > + /* Nothing changed, really */ > > + if (!S_ISGITLINK(alias->ce_mode)) > > + ce_mark_uptodate(alias); > > + alias->ce_flags |= CE_ADDED; > > OK, so RENORMALIZE option forces the code to skip the "does the path > exist already? maybe we can do without adding it?" check. > > > if (!intent_only) { > > - if (index_path(&ce->oid, path, st, HASH_WRITE_OBJECT)) { > > + if (index_path(&ce->oid, path, st, newflags)) { > > And then we do hash it. We later do add_index_entry() on this thing > and we have OK_TO_REPLACE bit in the add_option, so we are good to go. > > > diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c > > index 10c3a0083d..15abb184c2 100644 > > --- a/sha1_file.c > > +++ b/sha1_file.c > > @@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ static struct cached_object *find_cached_object(const unsigned char *sha1) > > return NULL; > > } > > > > + > > +static enum safe_crlf get_safe_crlf(unsigned flags) > > +{ > > + if (flags & HASH_RENORMALIZE) > > + return SAFE_CRLF_RENORMALIZE; > > + else if (flags & HASH_WRITE_OBJECT) > > + return safe_crlf; > > + else > > + return SAFE_CRLF_FALSE; > > +} > > + > > + > > int mkdir_in_gitdir(const char *path) > > { > > if (mkdir(path, 0777)) { > > @@ -1680,7 +1692,7 @@ static int index_mem(unsigned char *sha1, void *buf, size_t size, > > if ((type == OBJ_BLOB) && path) { > > struct strbuf nbuf = STRBUF_INIT; > > if (convert_to_git(&the_index, path, buf, size, &nbuf, > > - write_object ? safe_crlf : SAFE_CRLF_FALSE)) { > > + get_safe_crlf(flags))) { > > buf = strbuf_detach(&nbuf, &size); > > re_allocated = 1; > > } > > @@ -1714,7 +1726,7 @@ static int index_stream_convert_blob(unsigned char *sha1, int fd, > > assert(would_convert_to_git_filter_fd(path)); > > > > convert_to_git_filter_fd(&the_index, path, fd, &sbuf, > > - write_object ? safe_crlf : SAFE_CRLF_FALSE); > > + get_safe_crlf(flags)); > > > > if (write_object) > > ret = write_sha1_file(sbuf.buf, sbuf.len, typename(OBJ_BLOB), > > OK. We used to force CRLF_FALSE when we are not writing it out; now > we have three choices, and a new helper helps us isolating the logic > to make that choice. > > > diff --git a/t/t0025-crlf-renormalize.sh b/t/t0025-crlf-renormalize.sh > > new file mode 100755 > > index 0000000000..fb1ed631d2 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/t/t0025-crlf-renormalize.sh > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > > +#!/bin/sh > > + > > +test_description='CRLF renormalization' > > + > > +. ./test-lib.sh > > + > > +test_expect_success setup ' > > + git config core.autocrlf false && > > + printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE" >LF.txt && > > + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE" >CRLF.txt && > > + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE" >CRLF_mix_LF.txt && > > Did you mean to make all these files end with an incomplete line? I > think it does not hurt but it is misleading---the reader would try > to see if the incomplete lines are significant and necessary part of > the test, which is not, and would end up wasting time, no? > > > + git add . && > > + git commit -m initial > > +' > > + > > +test_expect_success 'renormalize CRLF in repo' ' > > + echo "*.txt text=auto" >.gitattributes && > > + git add --renormalize "*.txt" && > > +cat >expect <<EOF && > > +i/lf w/crlf attr/text=auto CRLF.txt > > +i/lf w/lf attr/text=auto LF.txt > > +i/lf w/mixed attr/text=auto CRLF_mix_LF.txt > > +EOF > > Perhaps use the <<-\EOF pattern? > > I'd suggest squashing this in (or I can do so myself if there is no > other change needed). > > Thanks. Looks mostly good. Thanks for review and proposed fixes and help. [snip the TC. Adding line endings is good)