Re: Test failures on 'pu' branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/8/2017 3:36 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ramsay Jones
<ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

t5300-pack-object.sh                             (Wstat: 256 Tests: 40 Failed: 2)

t5500-fetch-pack.sh                              (Wstat: 256 Tests: 355 Failed: 6)

These are series

t5601-clone.sh                                   (Wstat: 256 Tests: 102 Failed: 4)

This one is a spurious test. I had that flake on me once in the last weeks, too.
But upon investigation I could not reproduce.
See https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq376ipdpx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/


I suspect that the failures related to the jh/partial-clone-* branches
are probably due to slight differences between yesterday's part-1 and
last week's version of part-2 and part-3.

I'm going to be on vacation until Monday, so can we just pull those
parts out of 'pu' until I can get you new versions of parts 2 and 3 ?

Thanks
Jeff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux