Hi Stefan, On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johannes Schindelin > > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> ... > >> ( > >> for x in four three > >> do > >> git rm $x && > >> git commit -m "remote $x" || > >> exit > >> done > >> ) && > >> test 0 -eq $? && > >> ... > >> > >> Ugly? Yes. Correct? Also yes. > > > > I think returning non-zero with "return" is how other tests avoid an > > extra level of subshell. > > Ugly? Yes. Correct? Questionable but it seems to work for those who > > wrote them ;-) > > I think I'll go without the extra subshell and with s/return 1/false/ as > the exact value doesn't matter. You mean for ... do xyz || false done ? That does not work. Try this: for a in 1 2 3; do echo $a && false; done && echo done While it does not print `done`, it will print all of 1, 2 and 3. Ciao, Dscho
