On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:04:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > I don't think there's any reason to go slow in marking something as > > > deprecated. It's the part where we follow up and remove or change the > > > feature that must take a while. > > > > Makes sense, let me drop it from the synopsis then. > > what, exactly, is the oft-referred-to issue with how "git stash > save" works that is being addressed with the new syntax of "git stash > push"? "stash save" soaks up all arguments as the stash message, so it's not possible to specify pathspecs. "push" uses "-m <msg>" for the stash message, and can accept pathspecs. -Peff
