Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Perhaps. Also we may want to make sure that "git branch -D HEAD"
> > still works as a way to recover from historical mistakes.
>
> The only difference is improved tests where we use show-ref to make
> sure refs/heads/HEAD does not exist when it shouldn't, exercise
> update-ref to create and delete refs/heads/HEAD, and also make sure
> it can be deleted with "git branch -d".
>
In which case you might also like to ensure that it's possible to
"rename" the branch with a name "HEAD" to recover from historical
mistakes.
> diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha1_name.c
> index c7c5ab376c..1b8c503095 100644
> --- a/sha1_name.c
> +++ b/sha1_name.c
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ void strbuf_branchname(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name, unsigned allowed)
> int strbuf_check_branch_ref(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name)
> {
> strbuf_branchname(sb, name, INTERPRET_BRANCH_LOCAL);
> - if (name[0] == '-')
> + if (*name == '-' || !strcmp(name, "HEAD"))
> return -1;
I guess this makes the check for "HEAD" in builtin/branch::cmd_branch()
(line 796) redundant. May be it could be removed?
> strbuf_splice(sb, 0, 0, "refs/heads/", 11);
> return check_refname_format(sb->buf, 0);
> diff --git a/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh b/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh
> index e88349c8a0..4556aa66b8 100755
> --- a/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh
> +++ b/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh
> @@ -331,4 +331,27 @@ test_expect_success 'update-ref --stdin -z fails delete with bad ref name' '
> grep "fatal: invalid ref format: ~a" err
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'branch rejects HEAD as a branch name' '
> + test_must_fail git branch HEAD HEAD^ &&
> + test_must_fail git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'checkout -b rejects HEAD as a branch name' '
> + test_must_fail git checkout -B HEAD HEAD^ &&
> + test_must_fail git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'update-ref can operate on refs/heads/HEAD' '
> + git update-ref refs/heads/HEAD HEAD^ &&
> + git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD &&
> + git update-ref -d refs/heads/HEAD &&
> + test_must_fail git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'branch -d can remove refs/heads/HEAD' '
> + git update-ref refs/heads/HEAD HEAD^ &&
> + git branch -d HEAD &&
> + test_must_fail git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD
> +'
> +
> test_done
So, may be the following test could also be added (untested yet),
test_expect_success 'branch -m can rename refs/heads/HEAD' '
git update-ref refs/heads/HEAD HEAD^ &&
git branch -m HEAD head &&
test_must_fail git show-ref refs/heads/HEAD
'
--
Kaartic
