Re: [PATCH 0/3] Re: [PATCH] check-ref-format: require a repository for --branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Handles the nongit case in strbuf_check_branch_ref instead of
>>> introducing a new check_branch_ref_format helper.
>>
>> I view that as a regression, actually.  Don't we want a function
>> that does not require a strbuf when asking a simple question: "I
>> have a string, and I want to see if that is a valid name"?
>
> *shrug* I found the change easier to read, and it also sidesteps the
> which-header question.  It also ensures that other
> strbuf_check_branch_ref callers are safe without having to audit them.

Please ignore the above, which was merely an impression _without_
and before having received any patch to comment on ;-)

Quite frankly, this is a Meh topic that won't have to hit even
'next' before the final.  The color.ui=always thing has a lot more
urgency, and this was merely what I did while waiting for others to
react to that topic.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux