Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> And in that spirit, I think the patch you replied with aims to go in >> the right direction, by providing the core functionality when in a >> repository while avoiding breaking such a script outside of one >> (though I do not understand it fully yet). > > Given that, is it safe for me to ignore this earlier one > >> For what it's worth, I don't agree with this repurposing of >> "check-ref-format --branch" at all. > > as reacting to the patch without reading what it does? On second reading, yes, I was reacting to the discussion leading up to the patch instead of the patch. The patch looks good. Sorry for the noise, Jonathan
