Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Teach `write_locked_index(..., COMMIT_LOCK)` to roll back the lock > before returning. If we have already succeeded and committed, it will be > a noop. Simplify the existing callers where we now have a superfluous > call to `rollback_lockfile()`. This should keep future readers from > wondering why the callers are inconsistent. Makes sense. Thanks for cleaning up. The split-index codepath was something I've never reviewed seriously with fine toothed comb, and I feel a lot better now knowing that somebody other than its authors and me have read it through ;-)
