Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... Instead, require that one of the > flags is set. Adjust documentation and the assert we already have for > checking that we don't have too many flags. Add a macro `HAS_SINGLE_BIT` > (inspired by `HAS_MULTI_BITS`) to simplify this check and similar checks > in the future. I do not have a strong opinion against this approach, but if something can take only one of two values, wouldn't it make more sense to express it as a single boolean, I wonder. Then there is no need to invent a cute HAS_SINGLE_BIT() macro, either. "commit and leave it open" cannot be expressed with such a scheme, but with the HAS_SINGLE_BIT() scheme it can't anyway, so...
