RE: [PATCH v6 08/12] fsmonitor: add a test tool to dump the index extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torsten Bögershausen [mailto:tboegi@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:16 AM
> To: Ben Peart <Ben.Peart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ben Peart <peartben@xxxxxxxxx>; Junio C Hamano
> <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>; David.Turner@xxxxxxxxxxxx; avarab@xxxxxxxxx;
> christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx; git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx; pclouds@xxxxxxxxx; peff@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] fsmonitor: add a test tool to dump the index
> extension
> 
> >
> > Should I just make the variable type itself uintmax_t and then just
> > skip the cast altogether? I went with uint64_t because that is what
> > getnanotime returned.
> >
> 
> That is a bit of taste question (or answer)
> 
> Typically you declare the variables in the type you need, and this is uint64_t.
> 
> Let's step back a bit:
> To print e.g a variable of type uint32_t, you use  PRIu32 in the format string,
> like this:
> 
> fprintf(stderr, "Total %"PRIu32" (delta %"PRIu32"),",....
> 
> In theory (it is in the later specs, and it exists on many platforms), there is a
> PRIu64 as well.
> 
> We don't seem to use it in Git, probably because uintmax_t is (more)
> portable and understood by all platforms which support Git.
> (And beside that, on most platforms uintmax_t is 64 bit).
> 
> So my suggestion would be to keep uint64_t and cast the variable into
> uintmax_t whenever it is printed.
> 

Great!  That is the way I have it.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux