On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:31:38AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > Hmm, about three or four years ago, I spent two or three evenings > > getting git to compile -Wextra clean. I remember the signed/unsigned > > issue was the cause of a large portion of the warnings issued by > > the compiler. I was surprised that it took such a relatively short > > time to do. However, it affected quite a large portion of the code, so > > I didn't think Junio would even consider applying it. Also, I only used > > gcc and was anticipating having additional warnings on clang (but I > > didn't get around to trying). > > > > Maybe I should give it another go. :-D > > For example, I remember the patch given below reduced the number > of warnings quite a bit (because it's an inline function in a > header file). > > I just tried it again tonight; the current master branch has 3532 > warnings when compiled with -Wextra, 1409 of which are -Wsign-compare > warnings. After applying the patch below, those numbers are reduced > by 344 to 3188/1065. I'd love it if we were clean on -Wextra. My big question is many contortions we'd have to go through in the code. I don't mind at all if we're actually cleaning as we go (e.g., using types of the correct signedness, or preventing possible funny interactions). I'm just worried it will turn into a bunch of noisy casts. The patch you showed seems like an improvement to the code, but I don't know if that would be the case for all of them. :) -Peff
