On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:51:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > As long as we are talking about idealized future world (well, at > least an idea of somebody's "ideal", not necessarily shared by > everybody), I wonder if there is even any need to have commits in > submodules in such a world. To realize such a "monorepo" world, you > might be better off allowing a gitlink in the superproject to > directly point at a tree object in a submodule repository (making > them physically a single repository is an optional implementation > detail I choose to ignore in this discussion). IMO this is one step to far. One main use of submodules are shared repositories that are used by many superprojects. The reason you want to have commits in the submodule are so that you can push them independently and all other users can pick up the changes. You could get by by Using the superproject commits for the submodule once you push or something but those do not necessarily make sense in the context of the submodule. So I think it is important that there are commits in the submodule so its history makes sense independently for others. Or how would you push out the history in the submodule in your idea? Maybe I am missing something? What would be your use case with gitlinks pointing to trees? Cheers Heiko
