On 07/10, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> if (!is_submodule_active(the_repository, path)) {
> >> - strbuf_reset(&sb);
> >
> > Is this line removal intended? It doesn't look related to the rest of
> > this patch.
>
> It is, as &sb is re-used and has to be cleared first.
> With the code above removed, &sb is unmodified since
> struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT; hence the removal is ok here.
> It is related, but only when looking at the entirety of the code. :-/
Ah I see. Thanks!
--
Brandon Williams
