On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> if (!is_submodule_active(the_repository, path)) {
>> - strbuf_reset(&sb);
>
> Is this line removal intended? It doesn't look related to the rest of
> this patch.
It is, as &sb is re-used and has to be cleared first.
With the code above removed, &sb is unmodified since
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT; hence the removal is ok here.
It is related, but only when looking at the entirety of the code. :-/
