Re: Should "head" also work for "HEAD" on case-insensitive FS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ultimately I think the path forward is to have a ref backend that
> behaves uniformly (either because it avoids the filesystem, or because
> it encodes around the differences). See:
>
>   http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqvb4udyf9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> and its reply.

Once Michael's packed-refs backend stabilizes, we may have a nice
calm period in the refs subsystem and I expect that this will become
a good medium-sized project for a contributor who does not have to 
be so experienced (but not a complete newbie).

It needs to:

 - add icase-files-backend, preferrably sharing as much code as the
   existing files-backend, in refs/.

 - design a mechanism to configure which refs backend to use at
   runtime; as this has to be done fairly early in the control flow,
   this will likely to use early configuration mechanism and will
   probably need to be done in the set-up code, but doing it lazy
   may even be nicer, as not all subcommands need access to refs.

Thanks for a pointer to the archive.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux