Re: Should "head" also work for "HEAD" on case-insensitive FS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:00:49AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> I don't have a OSX box, but was helping a co-worker over Jabber the
> other day, and he pasted something like:
> 
>     $ git merge-base github/master head
> 
> Which didn't work for me, and I thought he had a local "head" branch
> until realizing that of course we were just resolving HEAD on the FS.
> 
> Has this come up before? I think it makes sense to warn/error about
> these magic /HEAD/ revisions if they're not upper-case.
> 
> This is likely unintentional and purely some emergent effect of how it's
> implemented, and leads to unportable git invocations.

JFTR this is one common case of confusion on Windows as well.
To the point that I saw people purposedly using "head" on StackOverflow
questions.  That is, they appear to think (for some reason) that
branches in Git have case-insensitive names and prefer to spell "head"
since it (supposedly) easier to type.

I don't know what to do about it.
Ideally we'd just have a way to perform a final check on the file into
which a ref name was resolved to see its "real" name but I don't know
whether all popular filesystems are case preserving (HFS+ and NTFS are,
IIRC) and even if they are, whether the appropriate platform-specific
APIs exists to perform such a check.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux