Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +struct wildmatch_compiled *wildmatch_compile(const char *pattern, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + struct wildmatch_compiled *code = xmalloc(sizeof(struct wildmatch_compiled));
> + code->pattern = xstrdup(pattern);
> + code->flags = flags;
> +
> + return code;
> +}
> +
> +int wildmatch_match(struct wildmatch_compiled *code, const char *text)
> +{
> + return wildmatch(code->pattern, text, code->flags);
> +}
Is the far-in-the-future vision to make this the other way around?
That is, this being scaffolding, wildmatch_match() which is supposed
to be precompiled match actually uses wildmatch() as its underlying
engine, but when a viable compilation machinery is plugged in, the
wildmatch_match() that takes a precompiled pattern will call into
the machinery to execute the compiled pattern, and wildmatch() will
be reimplemented as "compile, call wildmatch_match() once and
discard" sequence?
Otherwise I'd be worried about wildmatch() vs wildmatch_match()
introducing subtle behaviour differences that leads to hard to debug
problems.
