On 06/20, Andrew Ardill wrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > But as communicating between child_process is still an issue > > and so there was no simple was to current carry out the > > porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after > > discussing it, instead using the repository-object patch > > series will help to resolve these issues in this situation. > > Just wondering, does that mean that your patch series is dependent on > the repository-object one? I saw some discussion around it recently > but couldn't see it in the latest whats cooking so maybe I missed what > has happened to it. > Due to some of the discussion (and finding a bug with how git_path works with worktrees) I decided to break the series up into smaller bits since the original series was 30+ patches. Once 'bw/config-h' and 'bw/ls-files-sans-the-index' have been merged into next I'll probably send out v3 of the repository object series. -- Brandon Williams
