On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But as communicating between child_process is still an issue > and so there was no simple was to current carry out the > porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after > discussing it, instead using the repository-object patch > series will help to resolve these issues in this situation. Just wondering, does that mean that your patch series is dependent on the repository-object one? I saw some discussion around it recently but couldn't see it in the latest whats cooking so maybe I missed what has happened to it. Really enjoying your updates, by the way, they are very clear and show what looks like great progress! Regards, Andrew Ardill
