Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Looks good. >> >> I however wonder if it is a better approach in the longer term to >> treat the .ignore_case field just like .extended_regexp_option >> field, i.e. not committing immediately to .regflags but commit it >> after config and command line parsing is done, just like we make the >> "BRE? ERE?" decision in grep_commit_pattern_type(). > > I started hacking up a patch to fix the root cause of this, i.e. the > users of the grep API should only set `.ignore_case = 1` and not care > about setting regflags, but it was more than a trivial change, so I > didn't include it in this series: Ah, sorry. Now I re-read my response, "Looks good. I however wonder..." does sound like I am requesting to do something more to solve the same issue. I shouldn't have phrased it that way. It was more like "while I was staring the context lines of your patch, I noticed this tangent", nothing more. > ... > But an even better solution is to get rid of passing the regflags > field in grep_opt entirely, this conflicts with some of my later > patches: Yes, that may be a good direction to go in longer term, but let's not push it before the other bits already in flight land safely. > ... > But as all this code cleanup isn't needed for fixing this bug, and I'd > really like to get this series merged into next/master ASAP so I can > start submitting the grep/pcre patches that are actually interesting, > let's leave this orthogonal code cleanup for now. Yes. Thanks.
