Re: [PATCH 8/8] pathspec: convert parse_pathspec to take an index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ...  Note that if we go with the route to not pass
> in an index now, it doesn't necessarily mean that down the line we won't
> have to pass a 'repository' instance into parse_pathspec().

Correct.  

An attribute annotated pathspec may want to check if the attributes
used in it are used in the repository at all for validation or
optimization purposes, for example.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]