Re: [PATCH 0/5] Start of a journey: drop NO_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Just to throw out an example, I'm relatively new to the codebase (I've
>> been lurking on the mailing list for a few months now) and for a
>> recent project (I'm an undergrad wrapping up my senior year, and one
>> of my classes' final projects was to do something that involved
>> concurrency) I took a shot at parallelizing the estimate_similarity()
>> calls in diffcore_rename(). The only way I was able to get it to work
>> was by dropping global mutexes in one or two files (the code for those
>> mutexes still makes me cringe), because of concurrent writes to global
>> data structures.
>
> That sounds like a challenge. As we have many globals, we need to be
> very careful about threading.
>
> Also an interesting discussion about threading:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/9e4733910708111412t48c1beaahfbaa2c68a02f64f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks.

> Are the patches available for discussion?

I was planning on revisiting the patch series before sending it out -
the changes in attr.c and sha1_file.c are not pretty (and I'm pretty
sure one of them is non-portable) - but it is published at
https://github.com/sxlijin/git/commits/parallelize.thread-pool.1 (it's
based off v2.12.2).

> Thanks,
> Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]