Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> changes in v3:
>
> * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit.  It didn't
>   really fit inside the scope of this series.  It may be something we want to
>   revisit later though.
>
> * The --init-active flag now ensure that all submodules which are configured to
>   be 'active' (either via 'submodule.active' or 'submodule.<name>.active') go
>   through the initialization phase and have their relevent info copied over to
>   the config.

Aside from comments I sent already to the individual patches, I
think overall this coherently adds a nicer way to keep track of
which submodules are of interest (and which are not) than what we
traditionally had.  I'll queue it on 'pu', awaiting further
polishing (if necessary).

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]