Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> changes in v3:
>
> * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit.  It didn't
>   really fit inside the scope of this series.  It may be something we want to
>   revisit later though.
>
> * The --init-active flag now ensure that all submodules which are configured to
>   be 'active' (either via 'submodule.active' or 'submodule.<name>.active') go
>   through the initialization phase and have their relevent info copied over to
>   the config.
>

This round looks sensible to me.

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]