Re: [PATCH 2/6] Specify explicitly where we parse timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> -	unsigned long number = strtoul(date, &end, 10);
> >> +	time_t number = parse_timestamp(date, &end, 10);
> >
> > This hunk does not belong to this step.  Everybody else in this step
> 
> obviously I meant "the left half of this hunk" ;-)

Obviously ;-)

Ciao,
Johannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]