Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> - unsigned long number = strtoul(date, &end, 10); >> + time_t number = parse_timestamp(date, &end, 10); > > This hunk does not belong to this step. Everybody else in this step obviously I meant "the left half of this hunk" ;-) > still receives parse_timestamp()'s return value in ulong, not time_t. > I presume that that will happen in the final step 6/6 (which could > be a huge patch that exceeds 100k?)