Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Well Peff wrote in reply to your email: > >> I did co-admin last year and the year before, but I made Matthieu do all >> the work. :) >> >> I do not mind doing the administrative stuff. But the real work is in >> polishing up the ideas list and microprojects page. > > So I thought Peff would be ok to be the admin (do "the administrative > stuff"). There are several things the admins need to do: 1) "administrative stuff" about money with Conservancy (aka SFC). As I understand it, really not much to do since Google and Conservancy work directly with each other for most stuff. 2) Filling-in the application, i.e. essentially copy-past from the website. 3) Then, make sure things that must happen do happen (reviewing applications, start online or offline discussions when needed, ...). Last year Peff did 1) and I did most of 2+3). My understanding of Peff's reply was "OK to continue doing 1)". I think you (Christian) could do 2+3). It's much, much less work than being a mentor. Honnestly I felt like I did nothing and then Peff said I did all the work :o). I can help, but as I said I'm really short in time budget and I'd like to spend it more on coding+reviewing. > I don't think emails in this thread is what really counts. > I worked on the Idea page starting some months ago, and as I wrote I > reviewed it again and found it not too bad. OK, so giving up now seems unfair to you indeed. I created a Git organization and invited you + Peff as admins. I'll start cut-and-pasting to show my good faith ;-). > About the janitoring part, as I previously said I am reluctant to do > that as I don't know what Dscho would be ok to mentor. > And I also think it's not absolutely necessary to do it before > applying as an org. Right. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/