Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Matthieu Moy > <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: >>> >>>> * We need to write the application, i.e. essentially polish and update >>>> the text here: https://git.github.io/SoC-2016-Org-Application/ and >>>> update the list of project ideas and microprojects : >>>> https://git.github.io/SoC-2017-Ideas/ >>>> https://git.github.io/SoC-2016-Microprojects/ >>> >>> That can be done incrementally by people who care (especially mentors) >>> over the next week or so, and doesn't require any real admin >>> coordination. If it happens and the result looks good, then the >>> application process is pretty straightforward. >>> >>> If it doesn't, then we probably ought not to participate in GSoC. >> >> OK, it seems the last message did not raise a lot of enthousiasm (unless >> I missed some off-list discussion at Git-Merge?). > > I think having 2 possible mentors or co-mentors still shows some > enthousiasm even if I agree it's unfortunate there is not more > enthousiasm. A non-quoted but yet important part of my initial email was: | So, as much as possible, I'd like to avoid being an org admin this | year. It's not a lot of work (much, much less than being a mentor!), | but if I manage to get some time to work for Git, I'd rather do that | on coding and reviewing this year. and for now, no one stepped in to admin. Other non-negligible sources of work are reviewing microprojects and applications. Having a few more messages in this thread would have been a good hint that we had volunteers to do that. > Someone steps in to do what exactly? First we need an admin. Then as you said a bit of janitoring work on the web pages. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/