Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> With that information recorded in the log (or in-code comment, or >> both), if it turns out that some lines with the prefix are useful >> (or some other lines without the prefix are not very useful), they >> can tweak the filtering criteria as appropriate, with confidence >> that they _know_ for what purpose the initial "filter lines with the >> prefix" was trying to serve, and their update is still in the same >> spirit as the original, only executed better. > > Come to think of it, and considering that mutt happily signs emails in > the same conditions, maybe it would make sense to just ignore gpg return > code as long as there is a SIG_CREATED message... I do not think we want to go there. If GPG reports failure, there is something funny going on.